December 8, 2025
The UNC System is preparing to cave to political pressure from the Heritage Foundation, the Oversight Project, and the James Martin Center by further opening our public universities and colleges to bad-faith critique and extremist threats.
Peter Hans and UNC System administrators plan to follow in the footsteps of Florida, Texas, and Georgia by creating a single, searchable repository of all university and college syllabi. This move would endanger students and instructors by inviting political actors to attack the free inquiry on our campuses.
Add your name to this petition to demand that the UNC System protect academic freedom, our faculty, and our communities by abandoning this reckless plan.
We plan to deliver this petition on Friday, December 12.
AAUP NC members recently learned of closed-door UNC System decisions to radically change existing policy regulations related to course syllabi and public records.
We expect public reporting on this issue to be published at any moment. We wanted to share the news with members and take collective action as soon as possible.
UNC System administrators are planning to create a single, searchable repository of all university and college syllabi; they are determining that syllabi are no longer the intellectual property of instructors, but belong to the university.
Extremists like those in the Oversight Project have stated their desire to use public syllabi to ideologically restrict instruction and to target instructors.
Multiple classes in NC have been interrupted by intruders this semester, prompting classroom evacuations; this policy would open students and instructors up to more harassment.
Creating a single, searchable repository for all university and college course syllabi would not benefit students. Students already have access to course descriptions in course catalogs and schedules of classes; instructors already share draft syllabi with students before the beginning of a term.
Instructors frequently adapt course materials before the beginning of a semester, responding to new discoveries or recent debates in their fields; students may have false expectations for a course if they make decisions based on syllabi months before a course begins.
Courses and instructors will likely face escalating threats and harassment with the UNC System’s change in policy regulation, severely impacting classroom teaching and learning.
If instructors are compelled to limit their instruction to avoid extremist threats and harassment, then students’ free inquiry will be stifled.
We are calling on anyone in the broader community to sign our petition demanding that UNC System administrators abandon this dangerous policy change.
If you work or learn in the UNC System, bring questions and concerns directly to your campus leaders. These policy regulations would violate statements and commitments made by many university leaders this semester; these changes would create more threats and harassment for them to manage on their campuses.
If you are a faculty member, academic professional, or graduate student, you can join our movement to create the public and private colleges and universities that our communities deserve. If your campus has an AAUP chapter, you can join the local organizing.
Statement on US Customs and Border Protection Presence in North Carolina. November 19, 2025.
Statement on UNC Chapel Hill Administration's Violation of a Professor's Constitutional Rights. October 1, 2025.
For more, please see our page for Press Releases Issued by AAUP NC.
See our page on Resources for Protecting Our Immigrant Communities for steps you can take, for information about our rights, and for notes on trusted organizations.
See our page on Free Legal Help for AAUP NC Members to connect with our attorneys about violations of your rights or about the state of the law on academic freedom.
Our mission is to facilitate cooperation among the AAUP chapters in the State of North Carolina; to promote higher education and research in the state of North Carolina; to promote the welfare of the professoriate; to advance the causes of academic freedom, tenure, shared governance, due process, and the other objectives of the AAUP; to represent statewide the interests and concerns of faculty members of public and private institutions of higher learning; and to communicate state-wide concerns to the National AAUP.